
Esto es lo que dijo el periodista antes que editaran el artículo:
La nota original fue publicada en varios sitios incluído Kommersant https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/5985648 , donde se puede ver el original https://archive.is/2023.05.13-194904/ht ... ranscript/ y también escuchar la respuesta de Prigozhin (es un audio para Telegram), que aparentemente confirmaría la información...Q: The documents indicate that HUR, your intelligence directorate, has back-channel contact with Yevgeniy Prigozhin that you were aware of, including meeting with Yevgeniy Prigozhin and HUR officers. Is that true?
(...)
And I can read you what information exactly there is about Prigozhin and the GUR. On February 13,Kyrylo Budanov, chief of Ukraine’s Main Directorate of Intelligence, informed you about a Russian plan to destabilize Moldova with two former Wagner associates. Budanov informed you that he viewed the Russian scheme as a way to incriminate Prigozhin because “we have dealings” with him. You instructed Budanov to inform Moldovan President Maia Sandu, and Budanov told you that the GUR had informed Prigozhin that he would be labeled a traitor who has been working with Ukraine. The document also says that Budanov expected the Russians to use details of Prigozhin’s secret talks with the GUR and meetings with GUR officers in Africa …
A estas alturas Prigozhin está más seguro cerca del frente que en Moscú

EDITO: el WP volvió a editar el artículo agregando lo que había quitado, y redobló la apuesta con otra nota titulada:
"Wagner chief offered to give Russian troop locations to Ukraine, leak says", a cambio de que Ucrania retirara sus tropas de Bajmut... https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... documents/
Maravillosa jugada
