Agora vejo que a coisa descambou para acusações e assuntos que não tem nada haver com o tema. Uma pena.

Vamos lá pessoal, discutam essas diferenças por MP ou num tópico adequado...
Saudações.
Caio escribió:EUA dizem que disputa ainda não acabou
09 Setembro 2009
SÉRGIO DÁVILA E CLAUDIA ANTUNES
DE WASHINGTON
DA SUCURSAL DO RIO - FOLHA DE S.PAULO
O governo dos EUA considera que a disputa pelo fornecimento de 36 aviões de combate ao Brasil não está encerrada e reiterou que a proposta da Boeing é "forte e competitiva".
"Entendemos que uma decisão final ainda não foi tomada", disse um porta-voz do Departamento do Estado, que afirmou que seu governo "apoia totalmente a venda" do F-18 e "aprovou a transferência de toda a tecnologia necessária".
No fim de semana, a Casa Branca comemorou o fim do último obstáculo para a transferência de tecnologia do F-18. Foi quando o Congresso dos EUA esgotou, sem levantar objeções, os 30 dias do prazo para rever a proposta de venda. "Vamos continuar a trabalhar com o Brasil em todos os aspectos da competição até uma comunicação formal sobre a decisão", disse Paulo Guse, diretor de comunicações da Boeing.
Pela proposta da Boeing, o° F-18 sairia 40% mais barato que o Rafale. Contra a oferta, pesa o temor de vetos ao pacote após mudanças na Casa Branca. A França é vista como fornecedor menos instável.
Analista do Center for International Policy, Adam Isacson diz que a opção pelo Rafale seria um "golpe significativo para a Boeing" e lembra que a indústria de armas dos EUA tem perdido espaço na América do Sul, com a Colômbia e o Chile como seus únicos clientes fiéis.
fonte: Folha de São Paulo folha.uol.com.br
Hehe será que os americanos vão mostrar outra proposta?
saudações
Caio escribió:Eu nunca duvido dos americanos vice, João. Eles sempre tem uma ultima cartada hehehe
Embora tirar essa da mãos dos franceses seja realmente tarefa dificil mesmo.
Vamos aguardar os próximo capitulos![]()
abraço
Iris escribió:GIL escribió:Yo creo que la preferencia del gobierno esta mas que clara, rafales
la preferencia de la FAB es el sueco
pero por si acaso, las puertas estan abiertas por si no sale las cosas como Brasil desea.
Como bien dices amigo GIL, de siempre los aviadores brasileños, (influenciados quizás por sus colegas surafricarnos), siempre han visto con mejores ojos el Gripen que el Rafale, los políticos lo tenían claro, pero al final y por presiones de la FAB, tuvieron que hechar marcha atrás en sus declaraciones y confesar públicamente , que el concurso aún no estaba cerrado.
.- Saludos.
GIL escribió:parecemos marujas hehe.
solo por poner un poco mas de salsa y especular algo mas.
se comenta en una web brasileña militar que EUA acena con la compra de 100 supertucanos.
JoãoBR escribió:GIL escribió:parecemos marujas hehe.
solo por poner un poco mas de salsa y especular algo mas.
se comenta en una web brasileña militar que EUA acena con la compra de 100 supertucanos.
Não acena Gil. Na verdade o SuperTucano participa de uma concorrência nos EEUU e, claro, os gringos como não são tontos, deixam a entender que se o Brasil opta pelo F-18 os SuperTucanos ficariam "bem" no processo de seleção. Mas não é nada concreto, ou seja, acho que só "conversa mole" para tentar ganhar a concorrência. O famoso lobby.
Saudações.
GIL escribió:yo personalmente acredito mas que Francia nos compre los futuros carqueros que la USN los supertucanos, asi de claro, si lo hacen seria una gran sorpresa.
U.S. Eyes Super Tucano for SpecOps Work
By andrew scutro
Published: 13 Mar 16:22 EDT (20:22 GMT)
The U.S. Navy's new Irregular Warfare office has been looking at an agile Brazilian observation and ground-attack turboprop to provide an "organic" close air support aircraft for special operations forces.
Under the classified "Imminent Fury" program, the Navy has already leased, tested and armed at least one Embraer EMB-314 Super Tucano, according to Capt. Mark Mullins, a naval special warfare officer serving as the deputy director of the Navy Irregular Warfare Office at the Pentagon.
"This is a close air support, manned aircraft with a pilot and sensor operator. The idea here is that SOF needs an organic capability that can stick with them while they're doing their mission," Mullins said. "We're not buying them; we're leasing them right now. That's an important point."
Speaking March 12 at an exposition on expeditionary warfare in Virginia Beach, Va., Mullins said the intent is to put four of the single-engine aircraft into the fight as quickly as possible.
"Now we're in an operational pause, trying to figure out how to get to Phase II. We need about $44 million," he said. "Back to the method of venture capitalism, we're working with the Air Force and Marine Corps, socializing it with those guys to see if we can get money invested and get to Phase II, where we're taking four aircraft into theater."
The EMB-314 is flown by the military forces of Brazil and Colombia, according to Christine Manna, communications director at Embraer's office for North America in Fort Lauderdale, Fla.
As well, Manna said, Chile bought 12 planes and the Dominican Republic bought eight, but the planes have not been delivered yet.
The Super Tucano has a flight endurance of more than six hours, carries several sensors, can be armed with a heavy machine gun in each wing and has mounts for bombs, cannon and rocket pods, according to Jane's All the World's Aircraft 2008-9.
Calling it a "fascinating piece of kit," Mullins said "the proof of concept" is complete after a year of testing. But he described Imminent Fury as his new office's "most contentious project," mostly due to wariness from naval aviation.
"You can imagine the SOF guys and Marines really love this," he said. "The challenge here, and why it's so contentious, is it falls into the seam where it's really not clear whose bailiwick it is. It's not a marinized aircraft. It doesn't fly off the carrier."
Mullins said the Super Tucano can be landed on an unimproved airstrip such as a road, refueled in minutes and sent right back into the fray.
A briefing slide on the Imminent Fury project obtained by Defense News sister publication Navy Times identifies the need for a "tactical fixed wing [intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance] platform to provide expeditionary, organic Find/Fix/Finish operations for SOF Forces in a maneuverable, long range, low heat signature platform."
The project began following a visit by Navy Secretary Donald Winter with naval special warfare task forces in the Central Command area in October 2007, according to a similar brief.
"It's not about flying in from 1,000 miles away, dropping some thousand-pound bombs and leaving," Mullins said. "It's about working with [the ground force], doing the intelligence preparation of the battlespace, doing a [communication] relay, close air support, eyes on target and if there's squirters leaving the target, keeping up with them and tracking them down and doing [bomb damage assessment] at the end."
Although Mullins said the project is awaiting funding to move forward, a slide in Mullins' presentation indicated it's sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, Naval Air Systems Command and the Navy.
"Imminent Fury is a classified Navy initiative to address urgent warfighter needs," said Lt. Sean Robertson, a Navy spokesman at the Pentagon. "Initial developmental testing has been promising, and the Navy is currently conducting discussions with our Joint partners on various courses of action as this initiative moves forward."
Mullins delivered an unclassified brief, but details of Imminent Fury remain classified, Robertson said.
The Irregular Warfare office, part of the Navy staff at the Pentagon, was established in July under the direction of Adm. Gary Roughead, the chief of naval operations. It's headed by Rear Adm. Mark Kenny, a submariner.
"Our goal is to rapidly deliver capabilities and effects," Mullins said. "And we are the CNO's lead for irregular warfare."
Usuarios navegando por este Foro: ClaudeBot [Bot], Jorge R y 3 invitados