Para el programa nuclear iraní la administración de Barak Obama firmó en 2015 el Plan de Acción Integral Conjunto con todos los miembros del consejo permanente de Naciones Unidas y la UE. Se reducía el límite de centrifugadoras, se limitaba el enriquecimiento de uranio y se permitían inspecciones de la OIEA por parte de la República Islámica de Irán. A cambio se reducían las sanciones a este país. En 2018 Donald Trump se retiró unilateralmente del acuerdo. Aquí tienes algunos comunicados conjuntos y artículos publicados en su día sobre la decisión de Trump. Todo de 2018:Chepicoro escribió: ↑25 Mar 2026, 01:57 Maurice joly
Recordar que Trump decía que si ganaba Kamala USA iría a otra guerra y elegirlo a él era votar por la paz y como olvidar que se supone que él prometía alcanzar el equilibrio fiscal y para eso puso a Elon Musk al frente de DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency).Y venga otra ronda de 200.000.000.000 $ a cargo de John Doe, que hace falta plata para seguir matando a los malos.
Que en mi opinión bombardear a Irán esta bien, no se les puede dejar tener un programa nuclear que no es civil y aunque sea simbólico el régimen iraní debe ver alguna represalia luego de reprimir a manifestaciones de civiles con miles de muertos. Lo que critico a Trump es la forma tan chapucera como lo esta haciendo.
Comunicado Conjunto UK, Francia y Alemania:
It is with regret and concern that we, the Leaders of France, Germany and the United Kingdom take note of President Trump’s decision to withdraw the United States of America from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.
Together, we emphasise our continuing commitment to the JCPoA. This agreement remains important for our shared security. We recall that the JCPoA was unanimously endorsed by the UN Security Council in resolution 2231. This resolution remains the binding international legal framework for the resolution of the dispute about the Iranian nuclear programme. We urge all sides to remain committed to its full implementation and to act in a spirit of responsibility.
According to the IAEA, Iran continues to abide by the restrictions set out by the JCPoA, in line with its obligations under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. The world is a safer place as a result. Therefore we, the E3, will remain parties to the JCPoA. Our governments remain committed to ensuring the agreement is upheld, and will work with all the remaining parties to the deal to ensure this remains the case including through ensuring the continuing economic benefits to the Iranian people that are linked to the agreement.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/join ... nt-on-iran
Editorial del New york Times en su momento:
By reneging on the Iran nuclear deal, President Donald Trump has said, he will be able to get an even better deal, one that will also control Iran’s ballistic missiles and its regional influence.
Sound familiar? It should. This is the same kind of gesture toward a better, smarter deal that Trump made when he pulled the United States out of the Paris climate agreement, the same sort of empty promise he made in saying he would supply plans for Middle East peace and better, cheaper, more accessible health care. So far, again and again, he has shown himself to be adept at destroying agreements — an easy task for a president — and utterly lacking in the policy depth or strategic vision and patience to create new ones.
When it comes to the danger of a nuclear arms race in the Middle East, there is no sign Iran or any of the other major powers in the existing and so far successful pact will simply fall in line with Trump’s notional new plan. More likely, his decision, announced Tuesday, will let Iran resume a robust nuclear program, sour relations with European allies, erode America’s credibility, lay conditions for wider war in the Middle East and make it harder to reach an agreement with North Korea on its nuclear program.
In other words, par for the course. This man who, apparently because of one book and a reality television show, has a reputation as a dealmaker despite a skein of bankruptcies and lawsuits, has been piling up quite a record of scuttled agreements that he suggests “never, ever should have been made” and broken promises for a “better deal.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/08/opin ... hdraw.html
Artículo de Susan Rice, "La decisión más estúpida de Trump hasta el momento".
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/08/opi ... olish.html
Washington Post:
The inevitable happened. On Tuesday, President Trump announced his administration's intent to exit the nuclear deal with Iran, following through on a key campaign promise while shrugging off the desperate entreaties of European allies.
In his remarks, Trump panned the Obama-era deal as "one-sided" and suggested that Iran is "pursuing" nuclear weapons — something that neither American intelligence agencies, foreign governments nor the international monitors charged with inspecting Iran's nuclear facilities believe.
One person who has suggested the existence of an ongoing Iranian nuclear-weapons program is Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The Israeli leader gave a televised address last week detailing supposedly explosive revelations about Iranian deceit, but his findings detailed Iran's activities well before the Iran deal took effect in 2015. Even so, Trump's address seemed to piggyback off Netanyahu's. “We cannot prevent an Iranian nuclear bomb under the decaying and rotten structure of the current agreement,” he said.
Opinión en el Instituto Internacional de Estudios Estratégicos:
https://www.iiss.org/online-analysis/o ... -decision/
Y esto sin contar los inmumerables artículos en los que se sugiere que la retirada de Trump del Acuerdo fue consecuencia de su inestabilidad psicológica y de sus celos patológicos ante Obama. Y aquí estamos, en 2026, haciendo agujeros nuevos al cinturón en previsión de la que se nos va a caer encima y buscando justificaciones de todo género para este despropósito, desde la liberación de las mujeres iraníes hasta la amenaza de las armas de destrucción masiva, para variar. De momento, insisto, ya se ven los únicos ganadores: Vladimir Putin y los inside traders a la sombra de Trump especulando con el precio del petróleo ¿La reacción cuando leemos sobre estas infamias? Aquí tienes un ejemplo de hoy mismo:
Y con estos bueyes hay que arar en pleno 2026. Ye lo que hay, que dicen en Asturias.
y mirá lo que pasó... 
