Abbas says Hamas accepted same cease-fire plan it rejected at beginning of war
By KHALED ABU TOAMEH, HERB KEINON
LAST UPDATED: 08/28/2014 23:42
...
The cease-fire agreement that was signed this week between Hamas and Israel is not different from the original proposal made by Egypt at the beginning of the war, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas said on Thursday.
...
Abbas added that there was no difference "other than the losses and suffering we went through."
Zabopi escribió:¡Hola!
Por un gamusino, quién sabe que lado ha intentado atacar al otro y romper el alto el fuego.
http://www.infobae.com/2014/08/30/15913 ... tunel-gaza
Yorktown escribió:Dicen los mentideros palestinos, ahora conocidos como redes sociales, que el 'ministro del interior' de Hamás ha sido destapado como agente del Mossad y ha huido a Israel.
Hamas denies reports that former interior minister is Israel collaborator
Hamas sources denied over the weekend reports that the former interior minister in the Hamas government in Gaza, Fathi Hammad, defected to Israel after it was discovered that he was a Mossad agent.
The sources said that "the reports being published in a number of media outlets that Hamas official Fathi Hammad escaped abroad are groundless."
In comments made to the Fatah-affiliated Al-Kuffiah website, a source said that "Hammad has not fled Gaza and was not arrested on suspicion of collaborating with the security service of a country in the region, as was reported in the media."
He added that "the reports about Hammad are far from the truth, which is that he is continuing to act among the leadership of Hamas."
A day before the reports, Hammad was quoted as saying, "There is no phenomenon of collaboration with Israel." He said that "Israel enlists agents on an individual basis, therefore it is impossible to reveal additional collaborators through interrogation of a collaborator who is arrested by Palestinian security forces."
http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Hamas- ... tor-373002
UN: Israeli plan to annex W. Bank land 'illegal'
UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon is "alarmed" by Israeli plans to expropriate 400 hectares of Palestinian land in the Bethlehem area in the south of the occupied West Bank, his spokesman said Monday.
"The Secretary-General is alarmed by yesterday's announcement by Israeli authorities to declare as so-called 'state land' nearly 1,000 acres of land in the Bethlehem area of the West Bank," the spokesman said.
"The seizure of such a large swathe of land risks paving the way for further settlement activity, which - as the United Nations has reiterated on many occasions - is illegal under international law and runs totally counter to the pursuit of a two-state solution.
"The secretary-general calls on Israel to heed the calls of the international community to refrain from settlement activity and abide by its commitments under international law and the Quartet Road Map."
Earlier on Monday, Britain, France and Egypt on Monday joined the United States in denouncing Israeli plans to expropriate West Bank land, saying the move violates international law and is an obstacle to efforts for a lasting Palestinian-Israeli settlement.
Newly installed UK Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond said he "deplores Israeli decision to expropriate land near Bethlehem and urges Israel to reverse the decision."
"This is a particularly ill-judged decision that comes at a time when the priority must be to build on the ceasefire in Gaza. It will do serious damage to Israel's standing in the international community," the statement further added.
A statement by the Foreign Ministry in Cairo said "This is not a positive step -- it contradicts international law and will have negative consequences on the peace process."
The French foreign ministry issued a similar statement, saying it condemns the move and urges Israel to reconsider it.
Earlier in the day the US called on Israel to reverse its decision to appropriate 400 hectares of land in the West Bank, calling the move "counterproductive" to peace efforts.
"We have long made clear our opposition to continued settlement activity," a State Department official said. "This announcement, like every other settlement announcement Israel makes, planning step they approve and construction tender they issue is counterproductive to Israel's stated goal of a negotiated two-state solution with the Palestinians."
The Palestinian leadership on Sunday decried Israel's announcement of the land appropriation, intended for the construction of a new town called Gva'ot - an expansion of a small existing settlement in the settlement bloc known as Gush Etzion, south of Jerusalem.
http://www.i24news.tv/en/news/israel/di ... -bank-land
TovarTovar escribió:Tanto Israel como Rusia hacen lo que les viene en gana y se pasan por el forro las condenas de la comunidad Internacional, son gobiernos de la misma calaña; solo que a israel aun no se le imponen sanciones
Mauricio escribió:O sea, cul* y camiseta con Rusia.
TovarTovar escribió:Si lees bien no estoy comparando los escenarios, los comparo en cuanto su accionar ilegal es de acuerdo a su pocision, y se pasan por el forro el derecho Internacional y las condenas de medio mundo civilizado... si lo quieres entender bien, lo demas es mucha demagogia para defender lo indefendible
por cierto,no hay medallero que valga, si te quieres comer completica la propaganda del gobierno Israeli, simplemente te la comes sin mas criterio, que el de repetir lo que ellos dicen, como ya se ha demostrado, repetir lo mismito que dicen en sus ruedas de prensas, twitter o facebook el gobierno o las IDF,,, todo lo demas sera una opinion sin conocimiento o anticemita; ni pa que perder el tiempo
Mauricio escribió:Lo que hizo Israel no es ilegal.
Mauricio escribió: No ha pasado a controlar un territorio nuevo, ya lo controlaba. No reclama ese territorio como propio, el territorio sigue ocupado. No lo anexa, no extiende soberanía Israelí sobre el terreno, no cercena ni disminuye los territorios bajo control Palestino.
Mauricio escribió:Simple cambio administrativo. Esos territorios pasan de un estatus donde se presume que pueden tener dueño privado a un estatus donde se presume que son terrenos públicos.
Unión Europea condena la apropiación de tierras de Cisjordania por parte de Israel
La Unión Europea condenó este martes la declaración de 4.000 metros cuadrados de Cisjordania como área estatal por parte de Israel, especialmente en un "momento tan delicado" tras el reciente alto el fuego decretado en Gaza, y pidió al Gobierno israelí que dé marcha atrás.
"Condenamos la nueva apropiación de tierras en Cisjordania, en relación con los planes para una mayor expansión de los asentamientos anunciada por el Gobierno israelí el domingo", recalcó un portavoz de la jefa de la diplomacia comunitaria, Catherine Ashton, en un comunicado.
La decisión, que fue anunciada el pasado domingo por el Gobierno de Israel, afecta al conocido como asentamiento Gvaot, entre las ciudades palestinas de Belén y Hebrón, un área que no había sido reconocida antes por Israel porque se construyó sin permisos estatales.
"Los asentamientos son ilegales según el derecho internacional, constituyen un obstáculo para la paz y amenazan con hacer que la solución de dos Estados sea imposible", destacó el portavoz, quien recordó que la Unión Europea no reconocerá ningún cambio en las fronteras anteriores a 1967, "incluso con respecto a Jerusalén", salvo que lo pacten ambas partes.
"En este momento tan delicado, cualquier acción que pueda socavar la estabilidad y la perspectiva de (establecer) negociaciones constructivas después del alto el fuego en Gaza debe ser evitada", añadió.
Por ello, el portavoz hizo un llamamiento a las autoridades israelíes a "revertir esta decisión, y a participar con buena fe en un proceso hacia una paz duradera basada en la solución de dos Estados".
TovarTovar escribió:jajajaja, que buen chiste!
De verdad que no hay peor ciego que el que no quiere ver
La propaganda del gobierno Israeli no te deja ver mas alla de la nariz, na sabes del alcance que esto puede tener
Pero bueno, obviando la propaganda del gobierno de Israel, veamos mas de las condenas sin efectos practicos que toma la comunidad Internacional
Meanwhile, right-wing politicians in Israel welcomed the decision. Economy and Trade Minister Naftali Bennett (Habayit Hayehudi) said: "Building has always been the Zionist response to Arab terrorism. For 120 years, since the dawn of Zionism, we have built and the world has not liked this. When they [the Arabs] kill, we bring life. When they destroy, we build. Also now, with great patience and determination, we will continue to build our land."
Deputy Transportation Minister Tzipi Hotovely (Likud) said: "The recognition of these lands is a symbolic act that follows the right path. The overall process will be complete with the full annexation of Jewish settlements in Judea and Samaria. Today, it is clear to a majority of the public that terrorism only intensifies when Israel gives up territory."
On the other hand, Justice Minister Tzipi Livni (Hatnuah) slammed the move. "This is a wrong decision that weakens Israel and harms security," Livni said. "It is true that Gush Etzion will be part of Israel in any future peace agreement. I have insisted on this in every negotiation I've taken part in. The Palestinians also understand that [Gush Etzion] is part of Israel, but any declaration such as the one made now draws attention to Gush Etzion, and turns it from a point of consensus into a point of division. Unfortunately, just as there were those who played politics during the fighting [in Gaza], there are now those playing politics afterwards at the expense of Israel."
Finance Minister Yair Lapid also criticized the decision, asking, "What good does it do at this time?"
Lapid characterized the move as "underhanded opportunism"[u] that was done without cabinet approval[/u].
"It simply harms Israel," Lapid said.
Meretz leader Zehava Gal-On said the decision "once again reveals that the government works in service of the settlers."
http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newslet ... p?id=19819
TovarTovar escribió:Aqui las impresiones dentro del gobierno de Israel, algunos (los mas radicales) estan emocionados por la intencion de anexionarse los territorios, otros quieren ser mas precavidos y llaman a disimular las intenciones (o mal intenciones) para evitar confrontaciones la comunidad internacional (sobretodo EEUU)
En el fondo el gobierno en general quiere anexarse esos territorios, por mas que nuestros amigos propagandistas nos quieran hacer creer en unicornios rosas... las discrepancias dentro del gobierno es la forma, el momento y el impacto en la comunidad internacional, aunque esto ultimo, hemos visto que se lo pasan por el forro una y otra vez
Slds
Erzberger escribió:Más allá de eso la legitimidad de las acciones no está tanto en la decisión israelí, respaldada sólidamente, sino en la indisimulada en el mejor de los casos, clara y profunda convicción en otros, de la ilegitimidad que tiene propio estado de israel entre esos mismos interlocutores, y hacen irrelevante cualquier negociación.
Usuarios navegando por este Foro: ClaudeBot [Bot] y 1 invitado
